That means that you must put out of your minds anything that you have in the past read in the newspapers, or seen or heard on TV or radio about the accused or the circumstances giving rise to these charges. Furthermore, he explains everything very clearly so you are very clear on what is happening and why. The attempt to interfere with a witness by Mr Lynn was revisited, again with a reference to Paul Ferris.

I was advised that the witnesses who had undergone the procedure would be witnesses in the criminal trial, in which, of course, evidence as to the use of polygraph tests would not be admissible. Further, at virtually all times when the software was in use, the short form copyright notice was displayed which clearly showed that THJ held the copyright in ONE. Mr Sheridan graduated from Guy’s Hospital Medical School on 1979, continuing his postgraduate training in Southampton and in London at Queens Charlotte’s Maternity Hospital, Guy’s and St Mary’s Paddington.In conclusion, although the judge found that copyright subsisted in the software and graphic interface, the claim for damages on the basis of copyright infringement was dismissed.

In terms of the graphic interface, the judge found that elements of the graphic interface (including the graphic displays when the software is in use, and the ONE logo) were considered artistic works in which copyright subsisted, and that Mr Mitchell was the author and THJ the owner. Mr Sheridan is an American citizen who runs training via live programmes and webinars through his company Sheridan Options Mentoring (SOM). He then went on to train in Southampton, at Queen Charlotte’s Maternity Hospital and then as a registrar and senior registrar at Guy’s and at St Mary’s Hospital in Paddington. In 2015 Mr Sheridan left Watford General Hospital after spending 24 years there as a Consultant and is an examiner for the final membership examination of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

The question then arises as to whether the risk of prejudice can be removed by the operation of one or more of the recognised safeguards. He performs open abdominal surgery, vaginal surgery and keyhole surgery for heavy periods, fibroids, cysts, prolapse and incontinence. I am sure that it will not need to come to that because I am confident that having giving you these directions, each of you will act responsibly and comply with them. During this period many articles were published in a wide range of newspapers, some of which were not prejudicial, but some expressed scepticism about Mr Sheridan's position. A direction to decide only on the evidence would be inadequate because it would fail to address the residual effect and the conscious or unconscious reminding of the original material.

You can change your choices at any time by visiting Cookie preferences, as described in the Cookie notice. These factors would lead almost all users and viewers to conclude that SOM was making use of proprietary software of another company. the defendants infringed copyright when it used the ONE software in two presentations on 27 January 2016, after Mr Sheridan’s expulsion from the LLP and the termination of the licence agreements, contrary to section 20 of the UK CPDA 1988.If you do not consent for us to process your personal data for marketing activities, we will still be able to contact you about your enquiry. On 9 November 2004 at a meeting of the SSP's executive committee Mr Sheridan is alleged to have admitted that he was the unnamed MSP and that the allegations made by Anvar Khan were true. Potential jurors would have been likely to have read material which would form evidence in the criminal trial, the effect of which would be to remind them of what they had previously read. Crown witness 117, George McNeillage, claimed to have recorded on videotape Mr Sheridan making certain admissions. I instantly felt in safe hands with them; they take time to get to know you, explain everything clearly and make sure that you're happy and confident at all times.