Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W

Product Information

SKU “yang Diumumkan” masih belum tersedia. Silakan baca Tanggal Peluncuran untuk ketersediaan pasar. Intel classifications are for general, educational and planning purposes only and consist of Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCN) and Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) numbers. Any use made of Intel classifications are without recourse to Intel and shall not be construed as a representation or warranty regarding the proper ECCN or HTS. Your company as an importer and/or exporter is responsible for determining the correct classification of your transaction. Based on our evaluation, the 9100F's 4.20 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler. For playing games on a budget CPU, first up we have Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. This game punishes quad-cores and as you'd expect, the 9100F fairs no better than the 7600K. Granted we're still looking at playable performance with the quad-cores, but frame stuttering will be much more apparent with these CPUs. Hitman 2 typically isn't a great title for Ryzen CPUs, the 3rd gen Ryzen 7 3700X falls short of even the Core i7-7700K for example. However, this title also requires more than 4 threads. In the case of the 7700K it skates by thanks to Hyper-Threading support. The 7600K though struggles and it's the exact same story with the 9100F, the game is still playable and relatively smooth, but the 1600 AF does have a clear advantage here.

Battlefield V is even more demanding that Assassin's Creed: Odyssey and here frame stuttering is a massive problem with the quad-core chip. There is a 137% performance disparity between the 1% low and average frame rate with the 9100F, while we only see a 38% disparity with the 1600 AF.We've experienced that single-core performance is essential for some games, as many don't take full advantage of multiple cores. This article evaluates Intel's Core i3-9100F desktop CPU. We evaluated Intel's Core i3-9100F and compared it to others to determine which provides the best value as a gaming CPU. We shaped our testing methodology to focus on each CPU's attributes rather than solely on benchmarks. Taking a look at performance in 7-zip we see that the 1600 AF is almost twice as fast as the 9100F for compression work, here it was a whopping 93% faster. In fact, the Ryzen processor was just 11% slower than the Core i7-8700K and in a completely different league to the Core i3 model. Finally we have the Total War: Three Kingdoms results and again, the 1600 AF edged out the 9100F, this time allowing for 10% more frames on average and a 23% improvement in 1% low performance. Klasifikasi Intel adalah untuk tujuan umum, pendidikan dan perencanaan dan terdiri dari Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCN) dan Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). Segala penggunaan atas klasifikasi Intel tidak berhubungan dengan Intel dan tidak boleh dianggap sebagai perwakilan atau jaminan yang terkait dengan ECCN atau HTS yang sesuai. Perusahaan Anda sebagai importir dan/atau eksportir bertanggung jawab untuk menentukan klasifikasi transaksi yang tepat.

Max Turbo Frequency refers to the maximum single-core processor frequency that can be achieved with Intel® Turbo Boost Technology. See www.intel.com/technology/turboboost/ for more information and applicability of this technology. It offers you the best possible performance at 1080p resolution. Its performance is similar to the RTX 2070 but for a lesser price. You can also enjoy Ray Tracing and DLSS in games that support them. The quad-core Core i3-9100F was hopeless in Battlefield V, pretty bad in Assassin's Creed: Odyssey, fairly useless in The Division 2, and weak in Shadow of the Tomb Raider. When playing older or less demanding titles such as Far Cry New Dawn, the Core i3 did well, but so will the 1600 AF or any other hexa-core or better Ryzen processor. When it comes to decompression work that figure is blown out to a massive 127% margin, making the Ryzen CPU worlds faster than the 9100F and just 3% slower than the 8700K.

It can run most esports games at 100+ FPS without even having to tone down the graphics settings. Most AAA games run without any FPS drops. It replaces the GTX 1070 for a much lower price and offers you a decent value for money.